Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2009
5:15 p.m. • Room 4042
Open to public.
John Tasioulas explores the orthodox interpretation of the nature of human rights in his lecture, "What is a Human Right?".
What is it that we are talking about when we talk about human rights? The lecture defends an orthodox interpretation of the nature of human rights, according to which they are moral rights possessed by all human beings simply in virtue of their humanity. This view is contrasted with two rival conceptions that have gained in popularity in recent years: the reductive view, which identifies human rights with certain human interests, and the political view, which conceives of them as essentially triggers for international intervention or concern.
John Tasioulas is a Reader in Moral and Legal Philosophy at the Univesity of Oxford and a Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. He holds a BA in Philosophy and an LLB from the University of Melbourne and a DPhil from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. His research is in moral, legal and political philosophy, with an emphasis in recent years on philosophical questions about human rights, international law and punishment. He is the co‑editor (with Samantha Besson) of The Philosophy of International Law (OUP, forthcoming 2010). Other recent and forthcoming publications include: 'Punishment and Repentance', Philosophy (2006), 'Repentance and the Liberal State', Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law (2007), 'The Moral Reality of Human Rights', in T. Pogge (ed), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to Whom? (OUP, 2007) and 'Taking Rights out of Human Rights', Ethics (forthcoming, 2009). He is on research leave during 2008‑10, funded by a British Academy Research Development Award, engaged in a project on the philosophy of human rights.
John Tasioulas, "What is a Human Right?"
Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2009
Duke Law teams with Duke Dining Services to select new cafe vendor
Representatives of Duke Law faculty, staff, and students will participate in the selection of a new vendor to operate the second-floor café.
Blocher argues for creation of interstate market for sovereign territory in the U.S.
Professor Joseph Blocher argues that the unique relationship between state sovereignty and state territory in the United States creates threads—mobile state borders and active markets for public land and sovereign functions—that can and should be woven together to create an interstate market for sovereign territory.University of Pennsylvania Law Review
- Zhang, scholar of comparative legal history, property law, and Chinese law, to join governing faculty
- Helfer says international condemnation of antigay laws can cause a counterreaction New York Times
- Hobby Lobby, Healthcare, and Religious Expression
- Huckerby talks about the challenges involved in combating human trafficking N.C. State Technician
- International Courts in Context Workshop