A Debate
October 25, 2007
Sponsored by Duke Law's Federalist Society and Program in Public Law
Michael Paulsen
University of St. Thomas School of Law
Michael Gerhardt
University of North Carolina School of Law
Stare decisis, in Latin literally "Let the decision stand," is the doctrine by which courts adhere to previously decided cases or precedents. Professors Paulsen and Gerhardt debate this provacative topic, with Professor Paulsen specifically arguing that "the doctrine of stare decisis is . . . unconstitutional and disserves all of the rule-of-law values it is alleged to advance."
Watch the webcast
The Pernicious Doctrine of Stare Decisis
Other News
Subscribe to Duke Law News

Related News
- Schroeder analyzes DOJ leak investigation Christian Science Monitor
- Schroeder: Why the Justice Department may be right Huffington Post
- Baxter, Purdy, Richman, and Siegel honored with distinguished professorships
- Darrell Miller, scholar of constitutional law, civil rights, and civil procedure, joins governing faculty
- Warrantless GPS Tracking & 21st-Century Surveillance Technology: U.S. v. Antoine Jones
