The 2012 classmates argued on behalf of the petitioners opposite 2L finalists Phil Aubart and Oscar Shine, who was named outstanding oralist.
The arguments were based on an appeal of the Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinion in Catholic League for Religious & Civil Rights v. City & County of San Francisco.
Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit headed the panel, which included Judge James A. Wynn, Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and Judge Lee H. Rosenthal of U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
The judges praised all the finalists in their post-argument remarks.
“There was an artfulness in the way you presented your arguments and in responding to the questions thrown at you that was really very unusual, even for lawyers far more experienced than you,” Rosenthal said.
The case centered on a resolution passed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in response to a directive from Cardinal William Levada, a Catholic Church official who, in 2006, instructed Catholic social service organizations across the United States to stop placing children in need of adoption with same-sex couples. His directive was based on the church’s opposition to same-sex marriages. In response, the San Francisco Board passed a resolution calling the church’s position “hateful and discriminatory,” “defamatory,” and “insulting and callous.”
The case moved through the courts, until the Ninth Circuit held an en banc hearing on two points: whether the plaintiffs had standing to contest the resolution; and whether the non-binding resolution was a violation of the Establishment Clause.
Boyce and Ford represented the Catholic League for Civil and Religious Rights and two individual plaintiffs, who were suing the San Francisco Board of Supervisors,asking the court to declare the resolution unconstitutional and have the board remove it from their website and cease publishing it.
Its strong language constituted a “stigmatic injury caused by San Francisco’s anti-Catholic resolution,” Ford argued.
Aubart and Shine represented the City and County of San Francisco, claiming that the plaintiffs never demonstrated the kind of injury required for standing, that San Francisco was condemning a discriminatory act rather than the church, and that the board was protecting the rights of gay citizens and orphaned children.
Boyce was also on the winning team in the 2011 Dean’s Cup finals.
Initiated in 1963 by Deans E.R. Latty and J.D. Johnston, the Dean’s Cup competition is student-organized and hosted by the Moot Court Board. Students compete in pairs, initially arguing through two preliminary rounds. The eight best teams, based on their preliminary round oral argument scores, qualify for the quarterfinals, which are conducted in a round-robin format. Quarterfinalists also are required to draft a full, 30-page brief.