The Supreme Court has held Section 5 to be Constitutional in the past on the premise that it was needed, but that Congress would need to reconsider the justification for it when renewed. In 2006, Congress renewed the Voting Rights Act including Section 5 in full without any analysis of whether Federal pre-clearance of local election law changes is still serving a needed purpose. Should the constitutionality of Section 5 be upheld in light of current statistics? SCOTUS will decide in Shelby County v. Holder. For more information, please contact email@example.com
Is Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act Still Needed?
- Children’s Law Clinic co-founder Brenda Berlin leaves legacy in teaching, child advocacy, at Duke Law
- Former jurist Verniero '84 discusses significance of stare decisis doctrine to confirmation of new Supreme Court justice Star Ledger
- Justice Breyer cites Garrett’s work on death penalty decline in recent dissent