Black , Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf partner Howard Srebnick moots this upcoming case, which is scheduled to be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on October 16, 2013. At issue is whether, when a post-indictment, ex parte restraining order freezes assets needed by a criminal defendant to retain counsel of choice, the Fifth and Sixth Amendments require a pre-trial, adversarial hearing at which the defendant may challenge the evidentiary support and legal theory of the underlying charges. For more information, please contact Stephanie Lowd at email@example.com.
U.S. Supreme Court Moot: Kaley v. U.S.
- Azar ’99 argues Ninth Circuit appeal on behalf of Citi borrowers seeking class certification over bank’s failure to modify mortgages Law360
- Roberts '00 appointed to N.C. Ethics Commission N.C. Office of the Governor
- Hoffman '92 named Rutgers University's senior vice president and general counsel Rutgers Today