F. Hodge O’Neal joined the Duke Law faculty in 1959 and served as dean for two years. He remained a faculty member until 1975.
During O’Neal’s tenure as dean the law school took a stance on the Civil Rights Movement. In 1966 the North Carolina Bar Association refused to admit an African-American Duke graduate. In response the Duke Law faculty resolved on December 12 to terminate relations with the organization until all qualified applicants were given membership regardless of race. Relations were not resumed until July 1, 1969.
O’Neal is given credit for creating a new subject in the study of law, the suppression of minority stockholders in a close corporation. His work on this topic led to the recognition that close corporations are quite different from the typical traditional public corporation with shareholders and required different legal treatment.
Dean O’Neal completed his AB and LLB at Louisiana State in 1938 and 1940 respectively. During World War II he served as a lieutenant in the Navy. His first teaching position was at the University of Mississippi starting in 1945. From 1947 to 1956 he was dean of the Walter F. George School of Law at Mercer University. After serving as Duke Law’s Dean he returned to a professorship. He became the James B. Duke Professor of Law in 1972. In 1977 he became a faculty member at the law school of Washington University in St. Louis. He acted as their dean from 1980 to 1985. He retired in 1988 and died in 1991.
Sources:
Duke University, School of Law, Bulletin of Duke University School of Law [serial]
F. Hodge O'Neal, 73, Ex-Law School Dean [perma.cc/26X7-P966], The New York Times (January 24, 1991)
Frank L. Maraist, In Memoriam: F. Hodge O'Neal [perma.cc/NWY6-ER2Q], 51 La. L. Rev. (1991)
W. Bryan Bolich, Duke Law School, 1868-1968 : A Sketch [perma.cc/9W46-QZA2], Duke Law School Alumni Directory (1968-1972)
- Legal Accounting
- Securities Regulation
- Business Associations II
- Corporate Planning and Drafting
- Seminar in Corporate Planning and Drafting
- Seminar in Corporate Reorganization and Arrangements
- Contracts
- Business Associations
- Corporate Finance
Articles & Essays
- Lest We Forget What We Owe Jack Latty, 1988 Duke Law Journal 22-25 ()
- Vulnerability of Professional-Client Privilege in Shareholders Litigation, 31 Business Lawyer 1775-1798 () (with Stephen R. Thompson)
- Utilizing Rule 10b-5 for Remedying Squeeze-Outs or Oppression of Minority Shareholders, 16 Boston College Industrial and Commercial Law Review 327-346 () (with Ronald R. Janke)
- Control Arrangements in Close Corporations, 20 Practical Lawyer 27-42 () (with Ronald R. Janke)
- Close Corporation Legislation: A Survey and an Evaluation, 1972 Duke Law Journal 867-893 ()
- Control Distribution Devices, 1969 University of Illinois Law Forum 48-60 ()
- Problems of Minority Shareholders in Michigan Close Corporations, 14 Wayne Law Review 723-748 () (with Walter G. Moeling IV)
- Alexander Hamilton Frey: His Contributions to the Law of Corporations and Business Associations, 116 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1140-1152 ()
- Georgia’s Urgent Need for a Modern Corporation Statute, 3 Georgia State Bar Journal 265-274 ()
- The Close Corporation and the Colorado Lawyer, 39 University of Colorado Law Review 299-321 () (with Lanty L. Smith)
- The Small Corporation and the Proposed Arkansas Corporation Code, 17 Arkansas Law Review 356-372 ()
- Developments in the Regulation of the Close Corporation, 50 Cornell Law Review 641-662 ()
- Arrangements Which Protect Minority Shareholders Against Squeeze-Outs, 45 Minnesota Law Review 537-558 ()
- Business Associations—1959 Tennessee Survey, 12 Vanderbilt Law Review 1079-1089 ()
- Oppugnancy and Oppression in Close Corporations: Remedies in America and in Britain, 1 Boston College Industrial and Commercial Law Review 1-36 ()
- New Books and Recent Scholarship, 13 Vanderbilt Law Review 339-359 () (with others)
- Recent Legislation Affecting Close Corporations, 23 Law & Contemporary Problems 341-362 ()
- Giving Shareholders Power to Veto Corporate Decisions: Use of Special Charter and By-Law Provisions, 18 Law & Contemporary Problems 451-472 ()
