About the Horvitz Program
The Richard A. Horvitz Program in Constitutional & Public Law promotes better understanding of our nation’s public institutions, of the Constitutional framework in which they function, and of the principles and laws that apply to the work of public officials.
The Horvitz Program sponsors conferences, workshops, and informal brown bag lunches on topical constitutional and public law issues, sponsors visits by present or past elected officials, judges, and constitutional and public lawyers, and raises the visibility of constitutional and public lawyering as an option for law students to pursue at some time in their careers. To reach a broader audience, the Horvitz Program supports, encourages, and disseminates constitutional and public law scholarship and commentary by Duke faculty and others.
The Horvitz Program is supported generously by Richard A. Horvitz, a member of the Duke Law Class of 1978, and his wife, Erica Hartman Horvitz. Rick is a longtime donor to Duke Law School who has made previous gifts to help establish the Fund for Faculty Excellence, endow a professorship currently held by Professor Matthew D. Adler, endow a scholarship, provide fellowships to support students whose summer positions are unpaid, and create “Marcy’s Garden,” the lawn and garden area along the front of the Law School named for his late ﬁrst wife.
Professor of Law919-613-8529
Marin K. Levy’s principal academic interests include judicial administration, civil procedure, remedies, and federal courts. Her work has been published in the Yale Law Journal, University of Chicago Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Cornell Law Review, and California Law Review, among other scholarly journals, and has been discussed in The New York Times, Washington Post, Atlantic, and other public outlets.
Spinning Judicial History in Social Media Gold
In this episode of the Duke Law podcast, Professor Marin K. Levy gives an inside look at her successful Twitter account and its engaging and insightful threads spotlighting hidden gems from judicial history and little-known facts about the bench, including firsts for women and people of color. Levy, a scholar of judicial administration and federal courts, shares how she's learning to navigate social media as a law professor.
Administrative Adjudication and Arthrex
In United States v. Arthrex, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled on the application of the Appointments Clause to judges of the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, a tribunal established by Congress in 2012 within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and whether they were principal officers under the Constitution. Commentators include a Federal Circuit judge and renowned academics whose scholarship has focused on the issues.