The U.S. Supreme Court and the European Court of Justice: Contrasting Approaches to Competition Law

October 26, 2011Duke Law News

Professor Claude Mosseri-Marlio
American Business School, Paris
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
4:00 pm | Burdman Lounge
Duke Law School

Light refreshments will be served.  Free and open to the public.


Both the United States and Europe have been forged and structured on the rule of law. Yet on competition questions - the Supreme Court in America, the Court of Justice in Europe - along with the adjacent administrative and judicial departments - have rendered diametrically opposed decisions. Why is this so?

The answer lies mainly in the origins, structure and contrasts of the two courts. In turn this explains their diverging focuses on cases decided on both sides of the Atlantic. That background precisely suggests ways for future reductions of past turbulences.

Mosséri-Marlio is a professor of European law and the European Court of Justice at the American Busines School in Paris and visiting lecturer at the Tyumen University in Siberia.

Other News
  • Community Enterprise Clinic handles legal details of shopping center transformation

    A forlorn, largely vacant shopping center on 10 acres of asphalt in central Durham seems like an unlikely place for innovation. But Ann Woodward, executive director of the nonprofit Scrap Exchange, imagines transforming this site into a creative reuse arts district (the “RAD”).  This district, an inventive mix of nonprofits, cooperatives and for-profit companies, would not only ensure that the Lakewood Shopping Center becomes a profitable asset, but would also be the catalyst for the revitalization of the surrounding neighborhood.   

  • Zelenak analyzes Trump tax docs
      L.A. Times