The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers was the pivotal event of the 2008 financial crisis. Ever since the bankruptcy, there's been heated debate about why the Federal Reserve did not rescue Lehman in the same way it rescued other financial institutions. The Fed's leaders strongly asserted that they lacked the legal authority to save Lehman because it did not have adequate collateral for the loan it needed to survive. In his new book, "The Fed and Lehman Brothers", Laurence Ball argues that the official narrative of the crisis is wrong; the Fed could have rescued Lehman but chose not to because of political pressures and an underestimation of the damage the bankruptcy would do to the economy. In this video, Mr. Ball, a professor of economics at Johns Hopkins, discusses insights from his book. Sponsored by the Global Financial Markets Center.
Summer program in The Hague, "the legal capital of the world," gives students foundation in international and comparative law
Forging paths and making connections
Duke's Pre-Law Undergraduate Scholars Program offers networking and experiential learning opportunities
Bradley lays groundwork for new scholarly field
Helfer, Young among 50 scholars contributing to The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Foreign Relations Law
Defending free speech
First Amendment Clinic caps off successful first year, readies new Campus Speech Database.
Free at Last
Wrongful Convictions Clinic secures release of Charles Ray Finch after 43 years of incarceration
Laurence Ball | The Fed and Lehman Brothers
- Kimberly Martin Rehberg '94 is sworn in as Durham City Attorney, is first female in the role City of Durham (Twitter)
- Durham DA Deberry '94 says dismissal of old cases, fines and fee will let tens of thousands of people participate in region's economic boom NC Policy Watch
- District Attorney Deberry '94 co-authors opinion piece vowing to use prosecutorial discretion on new antiabortion laws The Washington Post