After conservatives blocked the nomination of Judge Garland, abolished the filibuster to confirm Justice Gorsuch, and confirmed Justice Kavanaugh amid questions regarding his past and partisanship, what solutions should progressives advocate in response? Please join Professor Mark Tushnet, from Harvard Law School, and Professor Neil Siegel, from Duke Law School, as they discuss this question. Lunch will be provided. Sponsored by the American Constitution Society. For more information, please contact Bryan Czako at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The tech issue
Teaching lawyers to lead the way with a focus on ethics and interdisciplinary engagement.
Forging paths and making connections
Duke's Pre-Law Undergraduate Scholars Program offers networking and experiential learning opportunities
Kennedy receives inaugural Bolch Prize
Bolch Judicial Institute award honors retired U.S. Supreme Court justice's dedication to protecting and advancing the rule of law.
Taking off the guardrails
Duke Law experts worry U.S. hasn't fixed regulatory failures that led to financial crisis, Great Recession
Playing Constitutional Hardball: Should Progressives Advocate Packing the Supreme Court?
- Saharia '05 discusses all-female leadership of firm's appellate and Supreme Court practice AmLaw Litigation Daily
- Duke's public policy school establishes endowed chair honoring Fleishman Sanford School of Public Policy
- Dickey '12 promoted in White House to special assistant and associate counsel to the president National Law Journal