Over the last 25 years, political scientists, economists, and legal scholars have created a large body of empirical work that focused on judicial decisionmaking. Most judges are either unaware of this literature or deem it badly mistaken, but others view it as a new tool for understanding how judges judge. This conference brings together judges and those who study them to discuss challenges in the field. For more information, contact Jonathan Williams at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Environmental Law Newsletter – 2017
Read about the Environmental Law and Policy Clinic’s first 10 years, a new book on regulating after crises, faculty scholarship, and more.
On the Ground
Students share their experiences working with asylum-seeking families at a south Texas detention center.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Prof. Siegel discuss the Court’s recent and upcoming terms, the importance of consensus, and Ginsburg’s legacy at D.C. Summer Institute event.
Duke Law Journal Conference on Measuring Judges and Justice
- Fallone LLMLE '17 discusses Bitcoin volatility WRAL TechWire
- Griffin: "One need look no further than the articles of impeachment against President Nixon or President Clinton to see that presidents can be held accountable for obstructive conduct" CBC: Power & Politics
- Corrigan '81 explains sentence in public corruption case First Coast News