On the blogs: Judging women judges

October 9, 2009Duke Law News

A new paper by Duke Law Professor Mitu Gulati and Research Associate Mirya Holman is generating talk in the blogosphere about the effectiveness of women judges and the ability of social scientists to measure quality in judicial decision-making.

The paper, “Judging Women,” is available for download on SSRN. Co-authored by Stephen Choi of New York University School of Law and Eric Posner of the University of Chicago School of Law, the paper addresses an assertion by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor that female judges might be better than male judges, a comment that generated accusations of sexism and bias.

Analyzing data from state high court judges, the paper’s authors measure three standards of judicial output ⎯ volume of opinions, number of outside state citations in opinions, and number of opinions that counter those of judges within the same political party ⎯ and find that male and female judges perform at about the same level.

The authors wrote about their findings on Slate, noting that “female judges are less qualified, based on traditional metrics, than male judges” because they “have attended lower-ranked colleges and lower-ranked law schools, they are less likely to have had judicial clerkships (a prestigious job often taken by top law school graduates), and they have less experience in private practice before becoming judges.”

However, the authors found “no statistically significant differences between the decision-making ability of male and female judges in any of our data sets. Female judges are cited just as often as male judges; they write as many opinions; and they are just as likely to dissent, and to dissent from opinions written by judges who belong to their party.”

The paper generated discussion on The Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog, The Faculty Lounge, The Conglomerate, Concurring Opinions, Economix, and TaxProf.
Other News
  • Susan Akers JD/MEM ’91

    After majoring in biology at Wake Forest University, Susan Akers broke new ground for Duke Law students by pairing her JD studies with the pursuit of a graduate degree in environmental management from the Duke School of Forestry and Environmental Studies (now called the Nicholas School of the Environment).

  • Environmental Law and Policy Clinic comments on proposed international regulations for mining the ocean floor

    The Environmental Law and Policy Clinic weighed in on the first-ever regulations proposed for mineral exploitation of the ocean floor in June, emphasizing the need to protect deep-sea biodiversity and ecosystem function.  Little is known about life in the deep sea, a region scientists have only recently begun to explore, but discoveries over the past few years by Duke scientists and others have provided glimpses of an astonishing range of biodiversity — including unique life forms thriving in super-heated thermal vent environments.