Griffin’s “Stories in Adjudication” wins AALS award

November 15, 2011Duke Law News

Professor Lisa Kern Griffin’s article, “Stories in Adjudication,” has won the Association of American Law School’s (AALS) Criminal Justice Section’s award for the best paper by a junior scholar. The award will be presented at the AALS annual meeting in Washington, D.C., in early January.

Griffin’s article, which is currently in manuscript form, examines the relationship between narrative theory and factual accuracy at trials. She draws on insights from cognitive psychology, epistemology, and linguistics to critique the prevailing “story model” of juror decision-making and then considers ways in which trial design might counterweigh the power of familiar stories. “Viewing trials through the lens of narrative theory brings sources of bias and error into focus and suggests increasing the influence of analytic processes,” Griffin writes in the abstract. The potential improvements she explores concern expanding discovery obligations, reframing standards of review, and “using limiting instructions to better inform how adjudicators respond to narrative in the courtroom.”
Other News
  • Keeping a critical eye on enforcement

    Decisions regarding the enforcement of laws are highly discretionary. The choice of a federal or state agency or attorney general to investigate, charge, litigate, or resolve a specific infraction of a statute or regulation or not gets little public, judicial, or scholarly scrutiny.

  • Change agents
    Duke Law faculty and students take on vexing legal and policy challenges