Bluebond ’13 and Hampton ’13 recognized for oral arguments at Vis Moot Arbitration Competition

March 28, 2013Duke Law News

Duke Law made an impressive showing in the in the 20th Willem C. Vis Moot Arbitration Competition that wrapped up in Vienna on March 28.  In a competition featuring 296 teams from all over the world, 3Ls Alex Bluebond, Ian Hampton, Chris Jones, and 2L Edward Bersuder made it to the Round of 16, when they were eliminated by a team from Singapore.  Bluebond and Hampton received honorable mentions as “Best Oralists.” 

Ariell Friedman ’14 and LLM candidate Katharina Riedl also are members of the Duke Law team. 

Many of the world’s leading arbitrators and experts on arbitration serve as panelists for the Vis competition, which is held in conjunction with international arbitration meetings in Vienna. The Vienna-bound students prepared for the international competition with practice moots in Washington D.C., and by video with the team from the City University of Hong Kong, winners of the 2013 Vis tournament.  They were accompanied to Vienna by their coaches, Senior Lecturing Fellow Charles Holton ’73, a partner at Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice who teaches Arbitration Law and Practice at Duke, and Jennifer Maher, associate dean for International Studies.

The goal of the Vis competition is to foster the study of international commercial law and arbitration for resolution of international business disputes through its application to a concrete problem of a client and to train students in methods of alternative dispute resolution.  When possible, tournament organizers pair teams from civil law schools with teams from common law schools in the general rounds of competition in order to foster exchange between individuals trained in different legal cultures.

Duke Law alumni in Vienna alumni welcomed the team and admitted LLM students at a March 25 reception.

Other News
  • Economic Growth and Development in Africa

    Nelly Wamaitha LLM ’17, an attorney from Kenya, describes herself as a skeptic of foreign aid structures and delivery in Africa. “I don’t think Africa’s problems can be solved with some Herculean effort that Africa does on its own, it’s obviously going to be a cooperative effort,” said Wamaitha, who practiced corporate law in Nairobi and London and studied theology at Oxford University before coming to Duke. “That having been said, the world has really botched up Africa in the past.”

  • Keeping a critical eye on enforcement

    Decisions regarding the enforcement of laws are highly discretionary. The choice of a federal or state agency or attorney general to investigate, charge, litigate, or resolve a specific infraction of a statute or regulation or not gets little public, judicial, or scholarly scrutiny.