Admin Law 2013: A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis | Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Bene...
Duke Law Journal presents: 43rd Annual Administrative Law Symposium: A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis which focuses on the role of well-being analysis in administrative law. The Symposium starts with Duke Law Professor Jonathan Wiener and his opening remarks. The panels begin with a presentation by Professors John Bronsteen (Loyola Univ. Chicago School of Law), Christopher Buccafusco (IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law), and Jonathan Masur (University of Chicago Law), who coauthored an article titled "Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Benefit Analysis."
Recorded on February 15, 2013.
Panel titled: Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Conference title: A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis. Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Benefit Analysis (Administrative Law Conference 2013)
Appearing: Opening remarks. Jonathan Wiener (Duke Law), speaker; Well-being analysis vs. cost-benefit analysis. John Bronsteen (Loyola Univ. Chicago School of Law), Christopher Buccafusco (IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law), and Jonathan Masur (University of Chicago Law), panelists.
Related paper: John Bronsteen, Christopher Buccafusco, and Jonathan S. Masur, Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Benefit Analysis, 62 Duke Law Journal 1603-1689 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol62/iss8/3