On February 3, 2017 the Duke Law Journal held it's 47th annual Administrative Law Symposium on Exclusion, Inclusion, and the Administrative State.
SESSION TWO: EQUALITY, RIGHTS, AND ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES
Presenters Bertrall Ross and Mila Sohoni; Commentators Gillian Metzger and Samuel Bagenstos; Moderator Margaret H. Lemos.
On February 3, 2017 the Duke Law Journal held it's 47th annual Administrative Law Symposium on Exclusion, Inclusion, and the Administrative State.
SESSION THREE: INCENTIVIZING EQUALITY THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Presenter Karen Tani; Commentator Eloise Pasachoff; Moderator Neil Siegel
On February 3, 2017 the Duke Law Journal held it's 47th annual Administrative Law Symposium on Exclusion, Inclusion, and the Administrative State.
Introductory Remarks by Matthew D. Adler.
SESSION ONE: AGENCY PRACTICE AND INEQUALITY: VIEWS FROM THE INSIDE
Presenters Olatunde Johnson and Kris Collins; Commentators Nina Mendelson and Kerry Abrams; Moderator Guy-Uriel Charles.
Duke Law Journal’s 45th Annual Administrative Law Symposium explores rising dysfunction within the federal appointments process.
“Shortening Vacancies” with Anne Joseph O’Connell & William A. Galston
“Effects of Senate Confirmation Delays in the Agencies” with Nina A. Mendelson & David E. Lewis
John M. de Figueiredo, moderator.
Conference titled: Is the Appointments Process Broken?: Insights from Practice, Process, and Theory
Duke Law Journal’s 45th Annual Administrative Law Symposium explores rising dysfunction within the federal appointments process.
Audience question and answer session moderated by Professor John M. de Figueiredo.
Conference titled: Is the Appointments Process Broken?: Insights from Practice, Process, and Theory
Duke Law Journal’s 45th Annual Administrative Law Symposium explores rising dysfunction within the federal appointments process.
'Advice and Consent' in Historical Perspective with Russell L. Weaver & Steven I. Friedland
Marin K. Levy, moderator.
Conference titled: Is the Appointments Process Broken?: Insights from Practice, Process, and Theory
Duke Law Journal’s 45th Annual Administrative Law Symposium explores rising dysfunction within the federal appointments process.
“Transcending Formalism and Functionalism in Separation of Powers Analysis: Reframing the Appointments Power After Noel Canning” with Ronald Krotoszynski & Josh Chafetz
Closing Remarks (with Paul Light)
Curtis A. Bradley, moderator.
Conference titled: Is the Appointments Process Broken?: Insights from Practice, Process, and Theory
Duke Law Journal’s 45th Annual Administrative Law Symposium explores rising dysfunction within the federal appointments process.
“Appointments, Innovation, and the Judicial-Political Divide” with Gillian Metzger & Stuart Benjamin
Marin K. Levy, moderator.
Conference titled: Is the Appointments Process Broken?: Insights from Practice, Process, and Theory
Duke Law Journal presents: 43rd Annual Administrative Law Symposium: A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis which focuses on the role of well-being analysis in administrative law.
Professor Matthew Adler (Duke Law) presents his piece, titled "Happiness Surveys and Public Policy: What's the Use?".
Recorded on February 15, 2013.
Lecture titled: Happiness Surveys & Public Policy: What's the Use?.
Conference title: Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis (Administrative Law Conference 2013)
Duke Law Journal presents: 43rd Annual Administrative Law Symposium: A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis which focuses on the role of well-being analysis in administrative law. The Symposium starts with Duke Law Professor Jonathan Wiener and his opening remarks. The panels begin with a presentation by Professors John Bronsteen (Loyola Univ. Chicago School of Law), Christopher Buccafusco (IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law), and Jonathan Masur (University of Chicago Law), who coauthored an article titled "Well-Being Analysis vs. Cost-Benefit Analysis."
Duke Law Journal presents: 43rd Annual Administrative Law Symposium: A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis which focuses on the role of well-being analysis in administrative law. Jennifer Hawkins (Duke Trent Center), Carol Graham (Brookings Institute) and Peter Ubel (Sanford School of Public Policy) discuss topics such as the reliability of hedonic data and the meaning of welfare.
Panel titled: The Meaning of Welfare.
Conference title: A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis. The Meaning of Welfare (Administrative Law Conference 2013)
Duke Law Journal presents: 43rd Annual Administrative Law Symposium: A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis which focuses on the role of well-being analysis in administrative law. The symposium concludes with an interdisciplinary panel discussing the merits of cost-benefit analysis versus well-being analysis. Panel participants include Jennifer Nou (University of Chicago), Lisa Robinson (Harvard Kennedy School), and Kip Viscusi (Vanderbilt Law). Moderated by Dan Bowling (Duke University School of Law). Closing remarks by Duke Law Professor Stuart Benjamin.
Duke Law Journal's 42nd Annual Administrative Law Symposium will focus on several important topics in administrative law today. Selected from over 80 proposals, the seven panelists explore issues pressing upon legislators, agency and Executive Branch officials, and judges, such as the politicization of agencies, the judicial review challenges posed by shared regulatory authority, and the emphasis on reason-giving in rulemaking. The participants will use both historical and empirical analysis to describe the current administrative-law landscape and prescribe alternatives for its future.
Duke Law Journal's 42nd Annual Administrative Law Symposium will focus on several important topics in administrative law today. Selected from over 80 proposals, the seven panelists explore issues pressing upon legislators, agency and Executive Branch officials, and judges, such as the politicization of agencies, the judicial review challenges posed by shared regulatory authority, and the emphasis on reason-giving in rulemaking. The participants will use both historical and empirical analysis to describe the current administrative-law landscape and prescribe alternatives for its future.
FCC Julius Genachowski chair discusses communications policy challenges at the Duke Law Journal's Administrative Law Symposium.
Originally recorded February 25, 2011.
Duke Law Journal's Fortieth Annual Administrative Law Symposium focused on immigration law and adjudication. The symposium explored the rights of unauthorized migrants in the United States and how those rights are obliquely enforced. The symposium also studied the adjudicative competencies of immigration judges in light of the increased involvement of local and state authorities in the enforcement of immigration law.
Duke Law Journal's Fortieth Annual Administrative Law Symposium focused on immigration law and adjudication. The symposium explored the rights of unauthorized migrants in the United States and how those rights are obliquely enforced. The symposium also studied the adjudicative competencies of immigration judges in light of the increased involvement of local and state authorities in the enforcement of immigration law.
Duke Law Journal's Fortieth Annual Administrative Law Symposium focused on immigration law and adjudication. The symposium explored the rights of unauthorized migrants in the United States and how those rights are obliquely enforced. The symposium also studied the adjudicative competencies of immigration judges in light of the increased involvement of local and state authorities in the enforcement of immigration law.
Duke Law Journal's Fortieth Annual Administrative Law Symposium focused on immigration law and adjudication. The symposium explored the rights of unauthorized migrants in the United States and how those rights are obliquely enforced. The symposium also studied the adjudicative competencies of immigration judges in light of the increased involvement of local and state authorities in the enforcement of immigration law.
Which policies prevail when federal agency action conflicts with state law? The Supreme Court focused on this question this year in Riegel v. Medtronic and will return to it next year in Wyeth v. Levine. This symposium brings distinguished scholars together to discuss this question at the core of constitutional law, administrative law, and public policy
Recorded on April 15, 2008.
Conference title: Administrative Law, Preemption, & Federalism (Administrative Law Conference (2008))
Remarks on legislative work to improve emergency management and disaster response.
Administrative Law 2006: Administrative Law and Emergency Management | Risk Assessment and the Hazards of Hindsight
Recorded on March 24, 2006.
Conference title: Administrative Law and Emergency Management: Katrina and Beyond (Administrative Law Conference 2006))
Appearing: Matthew Adler (University of Pennsylvania Law School), Douglas Kysar (Cornell Law School) and Thomas McGarity (University of Texas at Austin School of Law), panelists.
Recorded on March 24, 2006.
Conference title: Administrative Law & Emergency Management: Katrina & Beyond (Administrative Law Conference 2006))
Appearing: Dr. Robert Kadlec (US Senate Subcommittee on Bioterrorism & Public Health Preparedness), speaker
Combined remarks on tax policy and legislation in the aftermath of disasters. A question and answer segment followed the presentation.
Recorded on March 24, 2006.
Lecture titled: Disaster Relief, Tax Policy, & the Federal Action Imperative.
Conference title: Administrative Law & Emergency Management: Katrina & Beyond (Administrative Law Conference 2006))
Appearing: Richard Schmalbeck (Duke University School of Law) and Ellen Aprill (Loyola Law School, Los Angeles).
Remarks on how governments respond to disasters and how political accountability is shared.
Recorded on March 24, 2006.
Lecture titled: Political Externalities & the Response of Government to Disasters.
Conference title: Administrative Law & Emergency Management: Katrina & Beyond (Administrative Law Conference 2006))
Appearing: Ben Depoorter (University of Ghent Law School).
Remarks on the power of governors and state executives during crises.
Recorded on March 24, 2006.
Lecture titled: State Executive Lawmaking in Crisis.
Conference title: Administrative Law & Emergency Management: Katrina & Beyond (Administrative Law Conference 2006))
Appearing: Jim Rossi (Florida State University College of Law).