PUBLISHED:October 05, 2020

At tribute event, Duke Law community remembers Ruth Bader Ginsburg


Students, faculty, and alumni reflected on Justice Ginsburg’s legal, cultural, and personal impact at Oct. 1 online event.

The Duke Law community came together Thursday night to pay tribute to the life and work of U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died Sept. 18.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Ruth Bader Ginsburg

“For women, especially young women – for my daughters, for my students – she was a model of grit and greatness, a tiny woman in gloves and lace collars who became an intergenerational pop culture icon and a symbol of intellect and strength,” said Professor Lisa Kern Griffin, who clerked for Justice Sandra Day O’Connor during the 1997-98 term, which was also during Ginsburg’s tenure.

The online tribute event – sponsored by the Women Law Student Association, the Program in Public Law and the Dean’s Office – began with a series of slides sharing reflections from the Duke Law community about what the Justice meant to them. Then faculty and alumni, including several who had worked with her or argued in front of her, spoke about her impact and their memories of her.

Professor Neil Siegel, who was her law clerk in 2003-04, talked about how her public persona matched her private one.

“She looked just as good up close, she looked just as good in private – in many ways better,” he said, remembering how she would work into the late hours, even standing up to work so that she would not fall asleep. “She really cared about words. She cared about language. She thought it was important to say what one meant and only what one meant.”

Farrah Bara ’20 recalled Justice Ginsburg's appearance at a February conference she and the editors-and-chief of the top 16 law reviews, who were all women for the first time, organized to honor 100 years of women’s suffrage – and being both grateful and inspired.

“Justice Ginsburg knew that, at the end of the day, it’s impossible to stand on the shoulders of giants if they aren’t available,” Bara said.

Other faculty talked about Justice Ginsburg’s legal work and the lasting impact she made on the nation's culture and legal system.

“She and Thurgood Marshall are the only two justices who would have had historical impact even if they never became justices,” said Professor Emeritus Walter Dellinger, who once litigated cases before Justice Ginsburg as acting U.S. solicitor general during the court's 1996-97 term and once argued opposite her in a moot court trial. “She was a historic figure by the time she reached the Supreme Court.”

Professor Emerita Katharine T. Bartlett, a renowned scholar of family law and gender theory, called Ginsburg “the single most important figure in the advancement of gender equality in this country.”

Michael Dreeben ’81, who argued 105 cases in front of the Supreme Court during a 30-year career in the Solicitor General’s office, spoke about Justice Ginsburg’s demeanor on the bench, which often belied her sharp questioning. “She was a quiet, non-inflammatory justice, in my experience, with a definite bent for the practical,” he said.

Other speakers talked about how the legal impact that Ginsburg had led to changes for them, personally, as well as their family members.

Professor Maggie Lemos, who clerked for Justice John Paul Stevens during Justice Ginsburg's tenure, noted her young daughter chafes at gender stereotypes. “Why does everyone assume I like pink? I like black!” Lemos said she asks her. “With all of these thoughts of RBG swimming around in my head, all I could think was how this little girl is living in such a different world because of Justice Ginsburg, but so is my son – who likes pink – and so are we all. Doors are open to all of us that would not have been open, but for the work of this strong, invincible woman.”

Dean Kerry Abrams, who opened the tribute, put the work of Justice Ginsburg in context, reflecting on how much women's rights and status since she was born in 1971.

“I know that for some students that may seem like a very long time ago, but it’s really not. It’s less than half a century,” she said.

Abrams noted that, in 1971, a working woman who became pregnant could be fired, women were routinely omitted from jury pools, women were still refused admission to some colleges and universities, there was no law against sexual harassment, and few women had served as federal judges.

“So, what changed between 1971 and now?” she said. “Many things, of course. A robust feminist movement. Many pieces of federal legislation. Dramatic social change.

"But one thing that happened was Ruth Bader Ginsburg.”